Ella Parker-Tam

A close-up portrait of a young woman with long, slightly messy auburn wavy hair. She has fair skin with a natural blush on her cheeks, bright green eyes, and a soft smile with red lipstick. She is wearing a blue and white small-checkered button-down shirt with some buttons undone, and small pearl drop earrings. The background is a plain light grey wall.

Driven by a commitment to transparency and trust, Ella aims to apply her research and writing experience to help institutions communicate clearly, ethically, and credibly. Ella will be joining AMETROS Learning Inc. as a Product Development intern in summer 2026 and will begin the MPC graduate program at TMU in the fall.

Generative AI is rapidly reshaping higher education, transforming how students access information, complete assessments, and demonstrate learning. While universities emphasize academic integrity and caution around AI use, students are increasingly integrating these tools into their everyday academic practices—often without clear institutional guidance. This creates a growing disconnect between how learning is formally structured and how it is actually taking place.

This research examines how leaders at Toronto Metropolitan University understand the university’s institutional responsibility in responding to AI’s impact on student learning. Guided by the question, “How do TMU leaders understand institutional responsibility in relation to AI and student learning?”, the study draws on qualitative interviews with university leaders and a content analysis of public-facing institutional websites.

Findings reveal that while AI is widely recognized as a disruptive force—particularly in relation to assessment integrity—there is no unified institutional approach to addressing its implications for learning. Institutional messaging often prioritizes risk mitigation and academic integrity, while placing the responsibility on students to navigate AI use independently. At the same time, leaders acknowledge the need for long-term adaptation, including shifts in curriculum, assessment design, and digital literacy development.

This gap between institutional messaging and student experience highlights a critical transition period for universities. Rather than treating AI solely as a threat, institutions have an opportunity to redefine their role in supporting student learning. Strengthening transparency, integrating AI literacy into curriculum, and fostering clearer communication between students and educators will be essential to maintaining trust, relevance, and the value of a university education in an AI-driven world.

Lightning Talk

More Projects

A 'No Image Available' placeholder image with a bold, black serif capital 'S' centrally located. The background is an off-white, overlaid with three blurred abstract shapes: a light blue rectangle in the top center, a yellow circle in the bottom left, and a burgundy triangle in the bottom right. The text 'No Image Available' is displayed in black sans-serif font at the bottom of the image, all enclosed within a thin black border.
A headshot shows a young woman with tan skin, dark hair neatly pulled into a high bun, and large gold hoop earrings. She smiles broadly, revealing white teeth, and wears a dark pinstriped blazer over a white shirt, accessorized with two gold necklaces, one featuring a large 'A' pendant and another a smaller round charm. The background is a softly blurred modern indoor setting.
A young woman with long, straight dark hair and a warm smile, showing teeth and dimples, looks directly at the camera. She wears a black zippered top, a gold chain necklace with a heart-shaped pendant, and gold hoop earrings with white teardrop charms. The background is a softly blurred indoor setting with hints of light and blue.
Scroll to Top